全氟辛酸 (PFOA)、特氟龍和相關化學品

What are Teflon and PFOA? Where are they found?

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), also known as C8, is another man-made chemical. It has been used in the process of making polytetrafluoroethylene and similar chemicals (called fluorotelomers), although it is burned off in the process and is not present in significant amounts in the final product.

PFOA has the potential to be a health problem because it can remain in the environment and the human body for long periods of time. Studies have found that it is present in very low levels in the blood of almost everyone around the world. Higher blood levels have been found in residents of communities whose local water supplies were contaminated with PFOA. Levels for people exposed to PFOA in the workplace may be many times higher.

PFOA and some similar compounds are found in low levels in some foods, drinking water and household dust. Although PFOA levels in drinking water are generally low, they can be higher in some areas, such as near chemical plants that use PFOA.

People may also be exposed to PFOA in ski wax or stain-resistant treated fabrics and carpets. Nonstick cookware is not a significant source of PFOA exposure.

Do Teflon and PFOA cause cancer?

Whether Teflon and other nonstick coatings themselves cause cancer has not been a major focus. The main focus is on PFOA and similar polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) such as perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) and "GenX" chemicals.

Many studies have looked at the potential for PFOA to cause cancer. Researchers used two main types of studies to try to figure out whether this substance causes cancer.

laboratory research

In studies conducted in the laboratory, animals are exposed to a substance, usually in very large doses, to see if it causes tumors or other health problems. Researchers may also expose human cells in lab dishes to the substance to see if it causes the types of changes seen in cancer cells.

Studies in laboratory animals have found that exposure to PFOA increases the risk of certain tumors in the liver, testicles, mammary glands (breasts) and pancreas. Generally speaking, good studies in animals also do a good job of predicting which exposures may cause cancer in humans.

human research

Some types of studies look at cancer rates in different groups of people. These studies may compare cancer rates in a group exposed to a substance to those in a group not exposed to the substance, or to cancer rates in the general population. But it can sometimes be difficult to know what the results of these types of studies mean because many other factors may influence the results.

Studies have examined cancer rates in people who live near or work at chemical plants linked to PFOA. Some of these studies suggest that exposure to PFOA increases the risk of testicular cancer. Studies have also shown a possible link to kidney and thyroid cancer, but the increased risk is small and likely due to chance.

Other studies suggest possible links to other cancers, including prostate, bladder and ovarian cancer. But not all studies have found this link, and more research is needed to clarify the findings.

What do expert bodies say?

In most cases, the American Cancer Society does not determine whether something causes cancer (i.e., is a carcinogen ). Instead, we look to other respected organizations to classify potentially carcinogenic exposures.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the World Health Organization (WHO). One of its goals is to identify the cause of cancer. IARC classifies PFOA as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2B), based on limited evidence in humans that it causes testicular and kidney cancer, and limited evidence in laboratory animals.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), an electronic database that contains information on the human health effects of exposure to various substances in the environment. The EPA has not officially classified PFOA based on its carcinogenicity.

In a (non-final) draft report, the EPA's scientific advisory committee reviewed the evidence for PFOA, primarily from studies in laboratory animals, and said "there is suggestive evidence of carcinogenicity but is insufficient to assess carcinogenic potential in humans." . The committee agreed that new evidence would be considered as it became available.

Other agencies have not formally evaluated whether PFOA causes cancer.

What is being done about PFOA (and PFOS)?

The long-term effects of PFOA and similar chemicals are largely unknown, but there are enough concerns to prompt attempts to phase out their industrial emissions.

While the possible long-term health effects of PFOA have yet to be determined, in 2006 the EPA and the eight U.S. manufacturers that used PFOA at the time agreed to a "stewardship plan." The company's goal is to eliminate PFOA from emissions and product ingredients by the end of 2015. PFOA and some closely related chemicals such as PFOS are no longer manufactured in the United States, although they are still manufactured in some other countries and regions and may affect U.S. consumers in certain types of products. Additionally, there are many other PFAS in use and new ones are still being developed.

The EPA currently does not impose limits on the amount of PFOA or related chemicals (such as PFOS) in drinking water. However, the EPA has established health advisories for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water based primarily on the observed health effects of PFOA and PFOS in laboratory animal (rats and mice) studies. The health advisory level for these two chemicals (alone or combined) is set at 70 parts per trillion over a person's lifetime. These recommendations are not legally binding federal standards. They are intended to provide drinking water system operators, as well as state and other agencies responsible for overseeing these systems, with information about the health risks of these chemicals so that they can take appropriate actions to protect residents.

Additionally, EPA is currently considering developing drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS, which , if adopted, would set legally enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for these substances in drinking water.

Should I take steps to protect myself, such as not using my Teflon-coated pans?

There are no risks to humans from using cookware coated with Teflon (or other nonstick surfaces), other than inhaling the fumes from an overheated Teflon-coated pan, which may cause flu-like symptoms. While PFOA has been used in the past to make Teflon in the United States, it is not present (or present in very small amounts) in Teflon-coated products.

Because it is unclear how people may be exposed to PFOA, it is unclear what measures people may take to reduce exposure. People who find higher than normal levels of PFOA or similar chemicals in their regular drinking water sources may consider using bottled water or installing an activated carbon water filter, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

For people who are concerned they may have been exposed to high levels of PFOA, the levels can be measured in the blood, but this is not a routine test that can be done in a doctor's office. Even if testing is done, it's unclear what the results mean about possible health effects.

Review

All comments are moderated before being published

HealthyPIG Magazine

View all
黑眼圈成因全解析:從生理、生活習慣到醫學對策

黑眼圈成因全解析:從生理、生活習慣到醫學對策

前言:為何黑眼圈總是揮之不去? 「黑眼圈」係現代人嘅常見問題之一。無論係通宵工作、壓力過大、過敏,甚至遺傳因素,都可能令眼底皮膚變黑或出現陰影。雖然多數情況屬於美容問題,但有時亦可能反映身體狀況,例如貧血、睡眠質素差、血液循環不良等 [1]。  一、黑眼圈的主要類型與成因 色素型黑眼圈(Pi...
智慧手錶 vs 專用 O₂Ring 血氧儀:血氧監測能力的科學比較

智慧手錶 vs 專用 O₂Ring 血氧儀:血氧監測能力的科學比較

1. 前言 血氧飽和度(SpO₂)是評估呼吸、循環系統狀態的重要指標。近年來,市面上兩大類可穿戴設備用於血氧監測: 智慧手錶(如 Samsung Watch、Apple Watch) 專用血氧監測設備(如 O₂Ring、指夾式脈搏血氧儀) 兩種設備的設計目的、測量方式、準確性、監測...
血氧飽和度、氧氣下降與「警戒線」的科學探討

血氧飽和度、氧氣下降與「警戒線」的科學探討

1. 前言 血氧飽和度(SpO₂)即血液中氧合血紅蛋白佔總血紅蛋白的百分比,是臨床及居家監測呼吸、循環功能的重要指標。當血氧飽和度下降,可能反映體內氧的供應或運送出現問題(低氧血症、hypoxemia)或更廣泛的組織缺氧(hypoxia)[1][2]。本文旨在探討: 血氧飽和度正常範圍與變...
冰敷(Cold Therapy)真正作用全面解析:止痛、減腫,還是幫助修復?|科學視角 + 實證文獻

冰敷(Cold Therapy)真正作用全面解析:止痛、減腫,還是幫助修復?|科學視角 + 實證文獻

冰敷(Ice Pack / Cold Therapy / Cryotherapy)係好多運動、急性受傷(如扭傷、撞擊、肌肉拉傷)時的第一時間處理方法。但不少人會疑惑: 「冰敷純粹止痛,定係真係會幫助組織修復?」「冰敷幾耐?冰敷幾多日?會唔會影響身體自然修復?」 本文從科學、醫學、運動治療角度,...
長時間保持同一姿勢後關節痛、僵硬、郁唔到:成因、科學解釋與改善方法

長時間保持同一姿勢後關節痛、僵硬、郁唔到:成因、科學解釋與改善方法

前言:為何「坐耐、蹲耐、跪耐」之後會痛? 無論係坐喺電腦前、跪低執嘢、長時間翹腳、側睡又唔郁——好多人體驗過一樣情況: 「一動就痛、一企起身腳軟、膝蓋直唔到、關節卡卡聲,又或者要行幾步先鬆返。」 其實呢種情況係非常普遍,而且通常並非關節已經壞死,而係 和關節生理、滑液循環、血液供應、肌肉張力 ...
魚醒味的科學:成因、風險與處理方法全面解析

魚醒味的科學:成因、風險與處理方法全面解析

「魚醒味」是華人烹飪文化中常見的說法,用以描述魚類在 解凍、切片或加熱後所突然出現的腥味、血水味或脂肪味。此現象並不代表食材變壞,但背後牽涉到蛋白質變化、脂肪氧化與揮發性化合物釋放等多種科學機制。本文將以科學角度剖析魚醒味的成因,並提供實證方法降低這種味道,同時探討其安全性。 🧪 什麼是「魚...
牛肉需唔需要清洗?科學解釋、處理方法與食安建議

牛肉需唔需要清洗?科學解釋、處理方法與食安建議

不少家庭煮食者都會問:「生牛肉需唔需要清洗先煮?」特別係買梅頭(Chuck Tender / Chuck Roll)呢類切件時,可能見到少量血水、碎肉、黏液,就會擔心細菌問題。根據多個食品安全機構研究,其實 生牛肉一般情況下無需清洗,而且清洗反而會提高交叉污染風險。 下文將由科學角度解釋理由,...
如何正確清洗草莓?鹽水、梳打粉、白醋邊樣最好?科學比較+實證指南

如何正確清洗草莓?鹽水、梳打粉、白醋邊樣最好?科學比較+實證指南

草莓鮮甜多汁,但表面凹凸、種子細小,容易殘留泥沙、蟲卵、細菌與農藥殘留。市面上很多清洗方法,包括鹽水、醋水、梳打粉、臭氧水等,但到底邊樣真正有效、又不會破壞草莓的營養與口感? 今次文章從 科學研究與食物安全角度 分析不同清洗方法的原理、有效程度與正確用法,並提供一套 最安全、最有效的草莓清洗流...
牛肉與腸道微生態:人體點樣反應?

牛肉與腸道微生態:人體點樣反應?

牛肉進入身體之後會發生咩事? 食牛肉之後,身體會進入「高蛋白消化模式」: 胃部階段:胃酸(pH約2)與胃蛋白酶一齊將牛肉蛋白質分解成小分子胺基酸鏈。此時釋放「胃泌素(gastrin)」促進更多酸及酶分泌。 小腸階段:十二指腸接收食糜後,胰臟釋出胰蛋白酶、脂肪酶,肝臟釋出膽汁乳化脂肪。 ...