E104 喹啉黃

Identity

  • INS number 104
  • E 104
  • EINECS No. 305-897-5
  • CAS number 80583-08-0
  • CI Food Yellow 13
  • CI number 47005
  • CI Acid Yellow 3

use

Typical applications of quinoline yellow include beverages, confectionery, meat, bakery, butter fats and oils, seafood, snacks, dry blends and seasonings, fruit preparations, convenience foods, fragrances, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.

Quinoline yellow is used as a green-yellow food additive in some countries and is designated as E number E104 in Europe. In the European Union and Australia, quinoline yellow is allowed to be used in beverages and foods, such as sauces, decorations and coatings; quinoline yellow is not listed as allowed in Canada and the United States, where it is allowed to be used in medicines and cosmetics. The Codex Alimentarius for a food additive called d&C Yellow 10 does not list it.

Food use specifications

JECFA (2016)
European Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012

Codex GSFA regulations

The Codex Alimentarius Commission has completed the authorization of Quinoline Yellow (INS No. 104) for use in 7 categories of food, including soups and broths, decorations, toppings (non-fruit) and sweet juices, chewing gum, hard candies, soft candies, and nougat Sugar and marzipan, and flavored liquid milk beverages, as described in the General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA). Many other applications of quinoline yellow as a color additive in food and beverages have been proposed and are awaiting authorization after the review and comment process has been completed.

Regulatory approval

  • JECFA: ADI is 0-3 mg/kg body weight (the 73rd report, 2016)
  • United States: D&C Yellow No. 10 is a color additive, certified and permanently listed in GMP for general use in medicines (21 CFR 74.1710) and cosmetics (21 CFR 74.2710).
  • EU: ADI is 0.5 mg/kg body weight (European Food Safety Agency, 2009); EFSA also established MPL for the use of quinoline yellow in certain foods and beverages in Europe

assess safety

Quinoline yellow is a synthetic pigment used in foods, beverages, medicines and cosmetics. Although it is not approved for food in the United States, it is allowed for food in other countries (including the European Union, Australia and New Zealand). JECFA re-evaluated quinoline yellow in 2017 and believes that the existing quinoline yellow data provide a sufficient basis for establishing quinoline yellow's ADI. Based on the effect of higher doses on body weight and organ weight, two related long-term studies on rat D&C Yellow No. 10 showed that the minimum NOAEL in the diet is 0.5% (equivalent to 250 mg/kg body weight per day). Using the NOAEL and the uncertainty factor of 100, the committee determined the ADI of quinoline yellow to be 0-3 mg/kg body weight (rounded value). The Committee noted that based on analysis, reports, and/or industry use data, including conservative estimates from EFSA, children’s estimated range of dietary exposure to quinoline yellow is below the upper limit of ADI (0.3-10%). The committee concluded that dietary exposure of quinoline yellow to children and all other age groups does not cause health problems.

Health effects

Quinoline Yellow WS is not associated with any significant long-term toxicity, has no genetic toxicity or carcinogenicity, and has no evidence of adverse effects on reproduction or development. Generally speaking, food coloring is subject to strict scrutiny due to its impact on health.

Possible causes of ADHD

Since the 1970s and Benjamin Feingold's widely publicized advocacy, the public has been concerned that food coloring may cause children to behave like ADHD. These concerns prompted the US FDA and other food safety agencies to periodically review the scientific literature, and prompted the UK FSA to commission researchers from the University of Southampton to conduct a study to evaluate the effects of six food dye mixtures (lemon yellow, allure red, ponceau) 4R, Quinoline Yellow WS, Sunset Yellow FCF and Carmine (known as "Southampton 6") and sodium benzoate (preservative) are consumed by children in the general population, who consume them in beverages; the study was published in 2007 year. The study found that "there may be a link between the consumption of these artificial colors and the increase in sodium benzoate preservatives and childhood ADHD"; the FSA Advisory Committee that evaluated the study also determined that due to the limitations of the study, the results cannot be extrapolated to the general population, and Further testing is recommended."

European regulatory agencies have put more emphasis on the precautionary principle, requiring labelling and temporarily reducing the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of food colors; the British FSA called on food manufacturers to voluntarily withdraw these colors. However, in 2009 EFSA re-evaluated the data at hand and determined that “existing scientific evidence does not confirm the link between color additives and behavioral effects.” On the basis of other evidence, EFSA will also increase the acceptable daily intake (ADI) Reduced from 10 to 0.5 mg/kg.

After the Southampton study was published, the US FDA did not make any changes, but in 2008 after the Center for Science in the Public Interest submitted a citizen petition requesting the FDA to ban several food additives, the FDA began to review the existing The evidence has not changed.

There is no evidence to support the broad claim that food coloring can cause food intolerance and ADHD-like behavior in children. Certain food coloring may trigger people with genetic predispositions, but the evidence is insufficient.

Review

All comments are moderated before being published

HealthyPIG Magazine

View all
哪些職業對健康影響最大?科學與現實的分析

哪些職業對健康影響最大?科學與現實的分析

在現代社會中,工作佔據了人們生命中相當大的一部分。然而,不同職業對健康的風險並不相同。一些工作性質或環境,會顯著增加慢性病、心理壓力、甚至縮短壽命的風險。以下從科學研究與醫學角度,探討幾類對健康損害較大的職業,並附上相關統計數據。

電擊槍的機制與對人體健康影響

電擊槍的機制與對人體健康影響

在現代執法中,警察常使用所謂「非致命性武器」(less-lethal weapons),其中最廣為人知的便是 電擊槍(Taser)。電擊槍的設計初衷是提供一種介於徒手制服與槍械之間的選擇,藉由暫時性電擊使嫌疑人失去行動能力,以降低致命暴力發生的風險。然而,電擊槍並非完全無害,背後涉及的電流機制與人體生理反應值得深入探討。

PD-(L)1/VEGF「三抗」:腫瘤免疫治療新方向

PD-(L)1/VEGF「三抗」:腫瘤免疫治療新方向

腫瘤治療的新挑戰 近十年來,免疫檢查點抑制劑(Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, ICIs)改變咗癌症治療格局。當中 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制劑 已經成為多種腫瘤的一線或二線療法,而 VEGF 抑制劑 亦係抗血管生成治療嘅核心藥物。然而,臨床數據顯示,雖然 PD-(L...
疲勞駕駛的健康風險與新科技防護:REMONY 裝置的認證分析

疲勞駕駛的健康風險與新科技防護:REMONY 裝置的認證分析

疲勞駕駛一直是全球道路安全的重要議題。許多人將疲勞視為「只是累了」,但科學研究表明,當人處於極度疲倦時,大腦功能下降的程度可與酒精中毒相當。不僅如此,長時間駕駛還會對身體健康造成慢性負擔。隨著科技發展,越來越多可穿戴裝置被設計用來協助監測疲勞狀態,其中,日本 Medirom 公司開發的 REMONY 裝置近日獲得國土交通省(MLIT)認證,成為市場矚目的焦點。本文將先探討疲勞駕駛的健康風險,然後客觀分析 REMONY 裝置的技術特點與潛力。

腳跟為何會變黃乾裂?成因與護理全攻略

腳跟為何會變黃乾裂?成因與護理全攻略

腳跟皮膚為何容易出現問題? 腳跟係身體承受最大壓力嘅部位之一。每日行走、站立,腳跟長期摩擦同受壓,如果缺乏適當護理,就會導致角質層過度增厚、乾燥同龜裂。當角質層愈厚,皮膚顏色會慢慢變得偏黃,甚至暗啡。 造成腳跟黃、裂、脫皮的常見原因 角質層增厚長期行走或穿硬底鞋,令腳跟角質層積聚過多,顏色...
Wi-Fi 會唔會對人體有害?科學研究同日常生活影響全解析

Wi-Fi 會唔會對人體有害?科學研究同日常生活影響全解析

Wi-Fi 幾乎已經變成日常生活不可或缺嘅一部分。無論係屋企、公司、學校,甚至咖啡店同巴士,都有無線網絡覆蓋。但好多讀者都會擔心:「成日浸喺 Wi-Fi 入面,會唔會慢慢影響身體健康?會唔會致癌?會唔會令我失眠或者精神差?」 今篇文章會由淺入深,帶大家了解 Wi-Fi 嘅電磁波特性、科學研究結...
長時間保持一個姿勢,點解會痛、僵硬、麻痺?|久坐對身體嘅危害

長時間保持一個姿勢,點解會痛、僵硬、麻痺?|久坐對身體嘅危害

好多人每日要長時間坐喺辦公室、電腦前面,或者瞓覺時維持同一個姿勢。結果往往出現腰酸背痛、手腳麻痺,甚至覺得關節「鎖住」郁唔到。久坐傷身腳麻痺點解長時間坐姿影響健康,都係大家經常搜尋嘅問題。今次我哋就一齊睇下背後原因。

癌症如何擴散:從一個器官走到另一個器官的旅程

癌症如何擴散:從一個器官走到另一個器官的旅程

癌症最令人畏懼的地方,不單在於原發腫瘤本身,而是它能夠 轉移(Metastasis) —— 由原本的器官擴散至身體其他部位。事實上,大多數癌症致命的原因,並非來自腫瘤的「原居地」,而是因為它在其他重要器官(如腦、肝、骨、肺)形成了新的腫瘤。

腦癌種類全面介紹|常見類型與特徵

腦癌種類全面介紹|常見類型與特徵

腦癌(Brain Cancer)泛指源自腦部或蔓延至腦部的惡性腫瘤。臨床上可分為兩大類: 原發性腦腫瘤(Primary Brain Tumors):由腦部細胞本身變異而成。 繼發性腦腫瘤(Secondary / Metastatic Brain Tumors):由其他器官的癌細胞(如肺...